Examination of Patient Safety and Experience in Ghanaian Healthcare Facilities

Abstract

Objective: This paper analyzes Ghana’s healthcare quality challenges utilizing the Donabedian model covering structures, processes and outcomes to inform comprehensive systems improvement recommendations.

Methods: A mixed methods approach compiles empirical findings from multiple clinical studies across Ghana assessing healthcare infrastructure, service delivery patterns, and resultant patient consequences. Qualitative case reports provide context while quantitative metrics spotlight nationwide deficiencies. An adapted Donabedian framework incorporated expanded quality domains for rigorous evaluation.

Results: Significant infrastructure limitations, disjointed processes and alarming patient outcomes signify major quality gaps tied to wider health financing shortfalls. Specific issues include resource distribution inequities, medical supply unreliability, poor referral systems, limited staff accountability and infection control breaches—culminating in high preventable complications.

Conclusions: Interdependencies exist between financing, tools, clinical workflows and patient experiences whereby strengthening isolated aspects risks continued quality issues without addressing root causes holistically. Sustainable reforms necessitate coordinated investments in infrastructure, oversight, coordination and worker training.

Recommendations: A 10-step roadmap details structural upgrades, delivery protocols and monitoring mechanisms health authorities must institute in tandem to raise care standards for patient welfare and trust.

Scientific Significance: This paper advances use of mixed, multi-level modeling to diagnose complex health sector challenges in resource-limited contexts.

Practical Relevance: The blueprint formulated provides an evidence-based guide for policymakers to sequentially address identified healthcare deficiencies through coordinated quality assurance initiatives.